(AW) Conference Coverage (ICAAC) The Perils of Replacing Clinical Trials With Databases

DonateNow
Print this article

(AW) Conference Coverage (ICAAC) The Perils of Replacing Clinical Trials With Databases

AIDSWEEKLY Plus; Monday, October 19, 1998
Daniel J. DeNoon, Senior Editor


It is no longer possible to test all AIDS therapy regimens in controlled clinical trials.

There are more potential combinations of new AIDS therapies than can be tested in randomized trials. This leaves observational databases as the only means of evaluating these combinations.

But such evaluations are fraught with danger, warned Andrew N. Phillips of the Royal Free Center for HIV Medicine, London, U.K.

"In other disease areas important discrepancies between results from databases/cohorts and randomized trials have been identified," Phillips said in a plenary address to the American Society for Microbiology's 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC), held September 24-27, 1998, in San Diego, California.

He pointed to the example of beta carotene use for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Observational cohorts suggested that beta carotene prevented disease, but a later clinical trial demonstrated that its use actually increased risk of disease.

Databases, Phillips noted, are data collected regularly as part of the routine clinical care of unselected patients. Such data inherently lacks the hallmark of a clinical trial: blinded randomization of subjects with similar prognoses to the treatment options being compared. The inevitable incorporation of bias into databases raises serious questions as to how - and when - they can answer questions about treatment efficacy and safety.

Unfortunately, there appears to be no realistic alternative to the use of databases in evaluating modern AIDS therapies.

"We have more drugs than we can possibly test in combination," said David Cooper of the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Michael Saag of the University of Alabama, Birmingham, agreed.

"As therapies get more complicated, clinical trials get more complicated," he said. "It's going to be better use of databases that will determine clinical therapies in the future."

Phillips raised two central questions: Can databases be used to compare therapy regimens when direct clinical-trial data is lacking? Is it valid to look at databases and untangle their biases?

"If in the future we are going to do this thing, we are going to need sufficient numbers," he said. "We will need very large databases."

After analyzing databases incorporating data from patients receiving nucleoside-based antiretroviral regimens and comparing this data to that collected in randomized clinical trials, Phillips reached three general conclusions:

* Observational databases can give results similar to those seen in clinical trials - but not always.

* Observational databases are unlikely to reliably discern small differences between treatment regimens.

* Only randomized clinical trials can guarantee unbiased results.

"Where there is clinical uncertainty we must face up to the fact and randomize [into clinical trials]," he said.
981019
AW981010


Copyright © 1998 - Charles Henderson, Publisher. All rights Reserved. Permission to reproduce granted to AEGIS by Charles W. Henderson. Authorization to reproduce for personal use granted granted by C. W. Henderson, Publisher, provided that the fee of US$4.50 per copy, per page is paid directly to the Copyright Clearance Center, 27 Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970, USA.

Published by Charles Henderson, Publisher. Editorial & Publishing Office: P.O. Box 5528, Atlanta, GA 30307-0528 / Telephone: (800) 633-4931; Subscription Office: P.O. Box 830409, Birmingham, AL 35283-0409 / FAX: (205) 995-1588 http://www.newsfile.com

AEGiS is made possible through unrestricted grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, iMetrikus, Inc., the National Library of Medicine, and donations from users like you. Always watch for outdated information. This article first appeared in 1998. This material is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between you and your doctor.

AEGiS presents published material, reprinted with permission and neither endorses nor opposes any material. All information contained on this website, including information relating to health conditions, products, and treatments, is for informational purposes only. It is often presented in summary or aggregate form. It is not meant to be a substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals. Always discuss treatment options with a doctor who specializes in treating HIV.

Copyright ©1980, 1998. AEGiS. All materials appearing on AEGiS are protected by copyright as a collective work or compilation under U.S. copyright and other laws and are the property of AEGiS, or the party credited as the provider of the content. .